On September 30th we posted an article showing the letter that Robert Laity received from the Western District Court of New York.

I have written a response to that letter. Mack Ellis will print the letter and attach to the Grand Jury Super II Presentments and forward them to the court within the next few days.

Here is an image of the Response:

Here is the printed content of the response (the image is somewhat difficult to read):

Dear Mr. Carra,

Thank you for your response, however, apparently you misunderstand the documents that were referred to your office. These are Grand Jury Presentments. They have been served on your court 2 times now. This is NOT a lawsuit or any type of civil matter. This is a “criminal” prosecution matter and should immediately be treated as such.

Title 28 of the United States Code has nothing to do with this. Being represented in the New York District Court as a “pro se” litigant is ridiculous. The Grand Jury Presentments are now before the court and they need to be prosecuted. Any other course of action would be viewed as a violation of the laws of the Constitution of the United States.

It is your sworn duty as an Officer of the Court to attend to this matter immediately.

Please review the Grand Jury Presentments below and refer the matter to the head Judge in your District Court and have him commence the prosecution.

Regards,

Robert J. Campbell
Jury Foreman
American Grand Jury

The Super Jury II Presentments and our latest “Response” to Judge Lamberth have been sent by registered mail so we can release them to the public now.

Go here to see AGJ Response to Order# 2:

http://agjnow.org/responses/index.html

Here is the original Order# 2 received from Lamberth so you can see what we responded to:

The first Super Jury Presentments (173 members) were served on Judge Lamberth’s Court within a few days after being handed down. That was sometime at the end of June. Within a few days (by July 2nd) Judge Lamberth responded with an Order. You can see the Order displayed in this posting. American Grand Jury shortly thereafter filed a “Motion to Reconsider” with the Court which was an aggressive response.

Go here to see AGJ MOTION TO RECONSIDER:

http://agjnow.org/responses/motion.html

Here is the original Order# 1 received from Lamberth so you can see what we responded to: