One of our jury members, Maggie Passaro, received a more detailed reply from Congressman Trent Franks. The letter was written by Shari Farrington. I believe Shari to be a Patriot and someone who really cares about our Country. I also believe Trent Franks shares her anger and disgust for how the Constitution and our rights are being schredded daily as the result of the Democrats’ and Obama’s pure lust for power.

The only part I disagree with is the portion highlighted below. Legally, it is never too late. My opinion has always been you are never going to win the legal battle against Obama in a “civil” action. You need to beat him criminally. Obama committed criminal fraud LONG before he was elected or took office. The Presentments (criminal charges of fraud and treason) CAN and SHOULD be heard by a Court. For the life of me I have never understood WHY a person such as Trent Franks simply doesn’t take the Presentments to the Federal District Court in Arizona and demand that the Court, “review the charges and proceed.” At that point the Court would be forced to get off their butts and make a decision. If the Court rejected the Presentments after a Representative of Congress ask them to do their job [as required by the Constitution], the entire legal process would be open for suspect and debate. Furthermore, “We the People” would know for sure how to split the Judiciary wide open if they sided with Obama and tried to cover up his crimes against the Constitution. You fight evil by exposing it. Obama will never be able to stand up in Court to a legitimate criminal challege concerning his eligibility to serve in Office. The evidence is overwhelmingly against him.

Note: Obama could not easily stall a criminal indictment handed down by a Court. Such an indictment would stop him dead in his tracks and could legally remove him from office. On the other hand, he and his legal team can string out a civil lawsuit for years.

Farrington:

1) The congressman does not know for sure who writes these huge 1000 plus page bills. He believes it is a combined effort by lobbyists and
legal minds in cooperation with the members of the House and Senate who
have the particular agenda as their goal. Any bill that our office introduces is written by the congressman’s staff subject to his approval. then the bill has to be submitted to the House Legal Department who tweaks the wording to make sure it conforms to legal and ethical requirements. Then our bills are submitted to the particular committee that handles the particular subject described in the bill. The committee decides whether or not to vote on the bill. Since January of this year when Nancy Pelosi changed the rules of the House, none of our office’s bills have even been voted on in Committee.

2) Apparently most presidents have appointed Czars. However, Obama has taken it to the extreme. No president has ever appointed as many as he had. Nor has any other president ever selected Czars with the radical
history and agendas the current czars have. The Republicans have introduced a bill that would require any czar to be approved by the Senate. As far as I know, that bill has not been voted on in Committee either. (Trent is a co-sponsor of that bill). Apparently, Obama has appointed Czars in order to accomplish exactly what he wants to accomplish and Yes! They do have tremendous power and the only oversight they have is the President of the United States. Again, even if Congress is the entity that is authorized to perform these duties, because of the extreme radical and liberal nature of the current majority leadership, apparently they don’t have a problem with the
Czars’ activities.

3) Yes, there is something definitely underhanded going on in this
administration. Unfortunately, because Republicans are so outnumbered
and because of the House rules, the Republicans are virtually held
hostage. I am convinced that the half of America who elected
Republicans, is not getting any representation in Congress at all. It
is not because many of the conservative R’s are not trying to do all
they can…..they are being denied participation by the party who holds
the majority…and as you know, Obama is part of that majority.

4) I agree with you regarding the Constitution. I want to do
everything in my power to protect it!

People contact me all the time by the hundreds, if not thousands,
demanding that Trent do more. Until 2010, we are virtually helpless! You may choose to believe what I am saying or not. That is completely up to you! However, I am being as candid as I can. Meanwhile, the D’s, assisted by the media, declare over and over again, that the R’s have no alternatives..and are just saying “NO”! That is an outright LIE! I encourage you, and all others who are concerned, to get involved in your Legislative District and local political activities. It is up to us, the American people, to take back our country in 2010.

I am a patriotic American who loves my country. I am as angry, frustrated and frightened about what is going on in this country as anyone else is. I have children and great grandchildren who I want to be able to have the same opportunities growing up that you and I have had. I want them to enjoy the freedom and quality of life that Americans have enjoyed for more than 200 years. It is very discouraging to receive constant criticism and accusations that my boss is not working hard enough…that he doesn’t care about his constituents, etc. He is fighting a kind of battle in DC that is unbelievable and needs some encouragement, not constant criticism. As his representative and because I want to keep our constituents informed, I am doing everything I can, just as he is doing everything he can.

In any case, I will continue to answer every question and inquiry that I can. Trent receives 25,000-30,000 emails every week in addition to letters and phone calls. I personally receive hundreds of emails every day plus the phone calls and letters that come to our local office. Both of us receive constant criticism because we have not answered the inquiries in a timely manner or not at all. We also receive criticism for answering with a “generic” letter that does not specifically address the question. As to that issue, it is customary for every office to develop a generic letter when thousands of inquiries about the same issue. It is physically impossible to give a personal answer to every inquiry.

We receive many inquiries from people who are concerned about Obama’s
eligibility to be president. I agree that without question, there are
many valid questions regarding that. We receive new information every
day along with angry people demanding that we take action. Our legal counsel on staff in DC researched many avenues to see what action we could take. She discovered that legally action should have been taken by the RNC or McCain’s campaign as well as Congress before the election or immediately afterward in January. When the courts throw all the cases that have been brought before them out, there is nothing we can do right now. I am scheduled to have another conversation with her
tomorrow regarding this issue and others to get some more detailed information.

I wish I could give you better answers. The solution, though, is to get
involved with helping to effect the “change” that we desire.

Thanks.

Shari Farrington
D.O. Executive Asst. and Field Representative

Office of Congressman Trent Franks
623.776.7911 District Office