Judge Lamberth process-served with Grievance letter, Presentments and 3,181 Petition names
January 25th, 2010
The Grievance letter addressed to Judge Lamberth along with a copy of the Grand Jury Presentments and 3,181 Petition names were served upon the Court this past week in Washington DC.
PRESS RELEASE: January 25th, 2010 by American Grand Jury
American Grand Jury concluded a “Grievance Letter” campaign this month. The Petition ended up with 3,181 names [digital signatures] submitted through an online form. The Petition names were printed out in a spreadsheet format and hand-delivered by process-serve to Judge Lamberth’s personal clerk, Robert Elliotte. The package included an “original” copy of the Super II Grand Jury Presentments, the Grievance letter and Petition names.
We have included the PRESS RELEASE on our main website along with a short audio excerpt talking about the campaign.
http://americangrandjury.org/remember-the-agj-grievance-letter-campaign-to-judge-lamberth
The process-serve was made by Norman Abbott, an American Grand Jury member:







January 25th, 2010 at 1:58 am
[...] can see larger-size image on our American Grand Jury business website. Posted by Bob Filed in [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 9:24 pm
Just moved to this site from Dr. Orly Taiz site.
She has posted that today 01/25/2010 that she has filed Quo warranto in Judge Lamberth’s court.
Also she seems to be thinking of runnning for attorney general or secretary of state of Calif.
I think we all need to help her as much as possible.
Her website is under attack again so careful.
I got message of possible problem site and clicked ignore. At that time the message opened up another window giving reasons. I clicked on orly tab quickly and got on.
January 26th, 2010 at 2:36 pm
[...] can see the larger-size image on our American Grand Jury business [...]
February 9th, 2010 at 9:59 pm
This is a copy of an email I sent to Bob Campbell, today.
I have some insight reg. Judge Lamberth that I feel is worth sharing. After reading Larry Klayman’s latest book, Whores I feel Judge Lamberth is never going to act on AGJ Presentments. Klayman relates in detail a long standing case before Lamberth. Klayman is pursuing the Filegate case in which Hillary Clinton is the principle defendant in the case reg. how hundreds of IRS files came to be found in the White House. From the very beginning he sought to depose Hillary. At first Lamberth said Hillary would not be deposed until after all other avenues of obtaining testimony were exhausted. However, over a seven- year period of time Lamberth repeatedly denied him the opportunity. When pressed by Klayman, Lamberth said, “You may never get to depose her, Larry. I told you there is a body of law that says high government officials may not have to testify. And, I haven’t seen any hard evidence that she is involved.” (p. 186, Whores). He offered no response when Klayman pointed out that Hillary was not a government official. When pressed further he said, “I’ll reread your pleadings and we’ll see.” (p. 169). Klayman’s conclusion is “If Lamberth… was too scared to take on the likes of Hillary, how could the court system ever be effectively used to reform a corrupt political system.” (p. 169). .”.. On July 16, 2009, the Judge ruled that Hillary Clinton could not be deposed because she is now a cabinet secretary.” (p. 244). Despite all the latitude the Judge afforded Klayman, in the end, he failed to do the right thing.
Clear indications are that although sympathetic to the cause of exposing corruption on the part of government officials he (Lamberth) is willing to go only so far. There is a line that has been drawn that he will not cross out of fear for himself, his family or his reputation. The matter of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS will be no different! In the end he will fail to do the right thing. The citizens of the United States will not receive fair treatment accorded them by the the Constitution in his court!
Deeply saddened,
David Losey